+152.87%realised APR over 30 days
30 days · 179 settlements · 99% non-negative settlements
See the rate before making the trade
Compare current funding gaps alongside the past 30 days of settled rates.
Data as of 2026-10-21 20:05 UTC
-562.46%realised APR over 30 days
30 days · 253 settlements · 75% negative settlements
+131.62%realised APR over 30 days
30 days · 90 settlements · 95% non-negative settlements
-539.91%realised APR over 30 days
30 days · 327 settlements · 91% negative settlements
+96.91%realised APR over 30 days
30 days · 173 settlements · 100% non-negative settlements
-464.34%realised APR over 30 days
30 days · 224 settlements · 71% negative settlements
Widest gaps right now
Gap = highest annualised rate − lowest annualised rate, in percentage points
| Asset | Spread | High | Annualised | Low | Annualised | 24h turnover | Venues |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IOST | 6937.04 | Bybit | -2190.00% | Gate | -9127.04% | 27.5M | 4 |
| PTB | 1495.70 | Aster | +482.28% | Bybit | -1013.42% | 6.6M | 4 |
| AXIS | 855.70 | Bybit | -330.62% | Gate | -1186.32% | 1.2M | 3 |
| BTW | 450.05 | Bitget | -56.72% | Gate | -506.77% | 45.7M | 5 |
| DYM | 382.02 | Binance | -121.33% | Bybit | -503.35% | 1.0M | 2 |
| PRL | 367.48 | Lighter | +378.43% | Binance | +10.95% | 4.5M | 2 |
| BIRB | 358.01 | Bybit | +10.95% | Binance | -347.06% | 87.6M | 4 |
| CT | 299.91 | Gate | -604.00% | Bybit | -903.91% | 10.9M | 5 |
| MITO | 282.51 | Binance | +10.95% | Gate | -271.56% | 1.0M | 3 |
| DOS | 231.85 | Aster | +242.80% | OKX | +10.95% | 3.4M | 5 |
| AT | 224.30 | OKX | +10.95% | Bybit | -213.35% | 2.3M | 3 |
| PONS | 213.09 | Binance | +10.95% | Gate | -202.14% | 2.6M | 6 |
| ERA | 205.75 | Bybit | +10.95% | Binance | -194.80% | 23.8M | 4 |
| ORCA | 180.97 | Binance | +10.95% | Bybit | -170.02% | 3.8M | 3 |
| MEW | 175.87 | OKX | -460.55% | Gate | -636.41% | 2.4M | 5 |
| DOOD | 173.42 | Bybit | +33.26% | Gate | -140.16% | 50.9M | 5 |
| ARK | 144.08 | Binance | +10.95% | Bybit | -133.13% | 1.4M | 2 |
| SOPH | 142.55 | Bybit | +10.95% | Binance | -131.60% | 9.5M | 3 |
| TIA | 134.48 | Bitget | +10.95% | Bybit | -123.53% | 35.0M | 6 |
| ARIA | 130.96 | Bitget | +141.91% | Bybit | +10.95% | 21.5M | 4 |
| ZIL | 127.45 | Binance | +0.39% | OKX | -127.06% | 1.3M | 3 |
| FARTCOIN | 124.39 | Binance | +10.95% | Gate | -113.44% | 2.5M | 6 |
| JUP | 113.71 | Binance | +10.95% | Bybit | -102.76% | 8.4M | 5 |
| W | 105.65 | Bybit | +10.95% | OKX | -94.70% | 21.5M | 6 |
| SOON | 90.72 | Bybit | +101.67% | OKX | +10.95% | 8.6M | 5 |
| BASED | 87.87 | Binance | +10.95% | Bybit | -76.92% | 2.3M | 4 |
| IRYS | 80.25 | Aster | +79.43% | OKX | -0.82% | 38.5M | 6 |
| JCT | 80.25 | Aster | +91.20% | Gate | +10.95% | 23.2M | 5 |
| AGT | 76.48 | Binance | +74.95% | Gate | -1.53% | 8.8M | 2 |
| AERO | 75.56 | Bitget | +10.95% | Gate | -64.61% | 1.1M | 6 |
| ZEC | 75.23 | Hyperliquid | +10.95% | Bitget | -64.28% | 247.9M | 8 |
| FF | 73.15 | Binance | +10.95% | Bybit | -62.20% | 2.2M | 2 |
| BMT | 68.17 | Bybit | +10.95% | Binance | -57.22% | 49.3M | 3 |
| BULLA | 67.80 | Binance | +10.95% | Aster | -56.85% | 1.4M | 2 |
| UNITREE | 67.23 | Bitget | 0.00% | Gate | -67.23% | 6.0M | 4 |
| Q | 64.89 | Aster | +10.95% | Bybit | -53.94% | 38.8M | 5 |
| MET | 63.28 | Hyperliquid | +10.95% | Bybit | -52.33% | 3.6M | 4 |
| AAOI | 61.65 | Bitget | +61.65% | Gate | 0.00% | 6.8M | 4 |
| ZK | 60.74 | Bitget | +10.95% | Bybit | -49.79% | 4.6M | 5 |
| DNA | 50.10 | Bybit | +10.95% | OKX | -39.15% | 15.8M | 3 |
Both legs need at least $1M of 24h turnover. This threshold does not guarantee order-book depth or an executable price. Turnover shown is for the lower-rate leg; the funding gap is not a net return.
Before comparing funding gaps
To assess the two legs together, work through a funding spread after all four entry and exit fees.
Why is the gap shown in percentage points?
If two venues show 20% and −10% annualised, the gap is 30 percentage points. It is neither a 30% price difference nor a 30% return on capital. High and low describe the rate itself; negative funding pays longs and costs shorts. See the annualisation formula.
Why is the displayed gap not an arbitrage return?
Rates can reverse and settlements may occur at different times. Two-sided entry and exit fees, slippage, borrowing or transfer costs, and changes in price basis also matter. Margin on one venue cannot automatically support the other, so one leg may liquidate first. Check the asset page for contract specifications, settlement currency, turnover and history before estimating costs at your intended size.
Why can the cards and current table point in different directions?
The cards look back at settled rates over 30 days, while the table uses the latest collected quotes. The card share counts negative or non-negative settlements; zero funding transfers nothing. Historical coverage does not establish future persistence. See the history methodology.