English

Aster UNITREE perpetual

UNITREEUSDT

Use this contract in the calculator →

As of 2026-09-09 15:46 UTC, UNITREEUSDT on Aster has a collected rate of 0.0000% over 4h, or 0.00% simple annualised; its collected settlement interval is 4h. OKX has a lower rate for longs at -24.74%.

Rate
0.0000%
Rate period: 4h
Annualised
0.00%
187.0K 24h turnover

Affiliate disclosure: We may earn a commission if you register and trade through some links. Partnerships do not influence the data displayed or rankings.

Trade →

Contract specification

Quote currency: USDT · Settlement currency: USDT · Settlement interval: 4h. Lot size uses the venue’s original order unit; the calculator takes base-asset quantity.

Contract
UNITREEUSDT
Mark price
76.5300
Tick size
0.001
Lot size
0.01
Min notional
5

The same asset elsewhere

Venue Contract Rate period Annualised
OKX UNITREE-USDT-SWAP 8h -24.74%
Lighter UNITREE 8h -17.52%
Aster this page UNITREEUSDT 4h 0.00%
Bitget UNITREEUSDT 4h 0.00%
Bybit UNITREEUSDT 8h 0.00%
Gate UNITREE_USDT 4h 0.00%

UNITREE By venue →

Common questions

What is the Aster UNITREE funding rate?

The latest collected Aster UNITREE funding rate is 0.0000% over a 4h rate period, or 0.00% simple annualised. That period is used for conversion and may differ from the settlement interval. Positive means longs pay shorts; negative reverses this.

How often is funding charged on Aster UNITREE?

The collected settlement interval is 4h, normally 6 times a day. Venues can change it; confirm the next settlement time on the contract page.

Which venue has the lowest UNITREE funding cost for longs?

For a long position, OKX currently has the lowest rate at -24.74% annualised; this page's Aster is at 0.00%. Negative funding pays longs. Trading costs are excluded, and the cash-flow direction reverses for shorts.

Observation time and verification

This contract’s funding was observed at 2026-09-09 15:46 UTC; an unsettled quote may still change. A dash denotes missing usable data, not zero. Aster official data source · Funding methodology