English

Aster SAND perpetual

SANDUSDT

Use this contract in the calculator →

As of 2026-09-09 14:57 UTC, SANDUSDT on Aster has a collected rate of +0.0013% over 1h, or +10.95% simple annualised; its collected settlement interval is 1h. OKX has a lower rate for longs at -54.57%.

Rate
+0.0013%
Rate period: 1h
Annualised
+10.95%
17.4K 24h turnover

Affiliate disclosure: We may earn a commission if you register and trade through some links. Partnerships do not influence the data displayed or rankings.

Trade →

Contract specification

Quote currency: USDT · Settlement currency: USDT · Settlement interval: 1h. Lot size uses the venue’s original order unit; the calculator takes base-asset quantity.

Contract
SANDUSDT
Mark price
0.0383
Tick size
0.00001
Lot size
1
Min notional
5

The same asset elsewhere

Venue Contract Rate period Annualised
OKX SAND-USDT-SWAP 8h -54.57%
Bitget SANDUSDT 8h -5.69%
Binance SANDUSDT 8h -5.14%
Gate SAND_USDT 8h -1.20%
Bybit SANDUSDT 8h +8.82%
Aster this page SANDUSDT 1h +10.95%
Hyperliquid SAND 1h +10.95%

SAND By venue →

Common questions

What is the Aster SAND funding rate?

The latest collected Aster SAND funding rate is +0.0013% over a 1h rate period, or +10.95% simple annualised. That period is used for conversion and may differ from the settlement interval. Positive means longs pay shorts; negative reverses this.

How often is funding charged on Aster SAND?

The collected settlement interval is 1h, normally 24 times a day. Venues can change it; confirm the next settlement time on the contract page.

Which venue has the lowest SAND funding cost for longs?

For a long position, OKX currently has the lowest rate at -54.57% annualised; this page's Aster is at +10.95%. Negative funding pays longs. Trading costs are excluded, and the cash-flow direction reverses for shorts.

Observation time and verification

This contract’s funding was observed at 2026-09-09 14:57 UTC; an unsettled quote may still change. A dash denotes missing usable data, not zero. Aster official data source · Funding methodology