English

Aster MOVE perpetual

MOVEUSDT

Use this contract in the calculator →

As of 2026-09-09 15:46 UTC, MOVEUSDT on Aster has a collected rate of +0.0270% over 4h, or +59.14% simple annualised; its collected settlement interval is 4h. Gate has a lower rate for longs at -9.31%.

Rate
+0.0270%
Rate period: 4h
Annualised
+59.14%
9.3K 24h turnover

Affiliate disclosure: We may earn a commission if you register and trade through some links. Partnerships do not influence the data displayed or rankings.

Trade →

Contract specification

Quote currency: USDT · Settlement currency: USDT · Settlement interval: 4h. Lot size uses the venue’s original order unit; the calculator takes base-asset quantity.

Contract
MOVEUSDT
Mark price
0.0088
Tick size
0.000001
Lot size
1
Min notional
5

The same asset elsewhere

Venue Contract Rate period Annualised
Gate MOVE_USDT 8h -9.31%
Hyperliquid MOVE 1h -0.13%
OKX MOVE-USDT-SWAP 4h +1.13%
Bitget MOVEUSDT 4h +10.95%
Bybit MOVEUSDT 4h +10.95%
Binance MOVEUSDT 4h +44.44%
Aster this page MOVEUSDT 4h +59.14%

MOVE By venue →

Common questions

What is the Aster MOVE funding rate?

The latest collected Aster MOVE funding rate is +0.0270% over a 4h rate period, or +59.14% simple annualised. That period is used for conversion and may differ from the settlement interval. Positive means longs pay shorts; negative reverses this.

How often is funding charged on Aster MOVE?

The collected settlement interval is 4h, normally 6 times a day. Venues can change it; confirm the next settlement time on the contract page.

Which venue has the lowest MOVE funding cost for longs?

For a long position, Gate currently has the lowest rate at -9.31% annualised; this page's Aster is at +59.14%. Negative funding pays longs. Trading costs are excluded, and the cash-flow direction reverses for shorts.

Observation time and verification

This contract’s funding was observed at 2026-09-09 15:46 UTC; an unsettled quote may still change. A dash denotes missing usable data, not zero. Aster official data source · Funding methodology