English

Aster GALA perpetual

GALAUSDT

Use this contract in the calculator →

As of 2026-09-09 15:46 UTC, GALAUSDT on Aster has a collected rate of +0.0100% over 8h, or +10.95% simple annualised; its collected settlement interval is 8h. Bybit has a lower rate for longs at -4.74%.

Rate
+0.0100%
Rate period: 8h
Annualised
+10.95%
1.5K 24h turnover

Affiliate disclosure: We may earn a commission if you register and trade through some links. Partnerships do not influence the data displayed or rankings.

Trade →

Contract specification

Quote currency: USDT · Settlement currency: USDT · Settlement interval: 8h. Lot size uses the venue’s original order unit; the calculator takes base-asset quantity.

Contract
GALAUSDT
Mark price
0.0019
Tick size
0.00001
Lot size
1
Min notional
5

The same asset elsewhere

Venue Contract Rate period Annualised
Bybit GALAUSDT 8h -4.74%
OKX GALA-USDT-SWAP 8h -4.53%
Binance GALAUSDT 8h -2.79%
Aster this page GALAUSDT 8h +10.95%
Bitget GALAUSDT 8h +10.95%
Gate GALA_USDT 8h +10.95%
Hyperliquid GALA 1h +10.95%

GALA By venue →

Common questions

What is the Aster GALA funding rate?

The latest collected Aster GALA funding rate is +0.0100% over a 8h rate period, or +10.95% simple annualised. That period is used for conversion and may differ from the settlement interval. Positive means longs pay shorts; negative reverses this.

How often is funding charged on Aster GALA?

The collected settlement interval is 8h, normally 3 times a day. Venues can change it; confirm the next settlement time on the contract page.

Which venue has the lowest GALA funding cost for longs?

For a long position, Bybit currently has the lowest rate at -4.74% annualised; this page's Aster is at +10.95%. Negative funding pays longs. Trading costs are excluded, and the cash-flow direction reverses for shorts.

Observation time and verification

This contract’s funding was observed at 2026-09-09 15:46 UTC; an unsettled quote may still change. A dash denotes missing usable data, not zero. Aster official data source · Funding methodology