Gate CELR perpetual
CELR_USDT
As of 2026-10-15 05:57 UTC, CELR_USDT on Gate has a collected rate of -0.0007% over 8h, or -0.77% simple annualised; its collected settlement interval is 8h, with up to 25x leverage. Binance has a lower rate for longs at -32.46%.
What does this rate mean for a 10,000 USDT position?
For CELR_USDT, 10,000 USDT of notional × -0.000700% gives 0.0700 USDT over the quoted 8h rate period: longs receive and shorts pay. This is a constant-rate illustration, not a settled bill or a forecast. Use the actual settlement rate and notional at each settlement; leverage is not multiplied again. Trading fees are separate.
How do I select the margin tier for CELR_USDT?
This table selects tiers by position notional in USDT, not by the amount of margin deposited. The first tier starts at 0 and ends at 3000 USDT. Above that, tier 2 requires 3.5000% maintenance margin.
Contract units and calculator input
One CELR_USDT contract represents 10 CELR. Order lot size is expressed in the venue’s original unit. The liquidation calculator expects base-asset quantity; do not enter a contract count without converting units.
Further readingHow liquidation price is calculated: tiered maintenance margin and deductionsHow funding fees work: amounts, signs and settlement
Settled history is not currently available for this contract. The latest funding snapshot cannot establish the actual funding cost over the past 30 days.
Maintenance margin ladder
With deduction · An isolated-margin estimate for linear contracts; excludes closing fees, accrued funding, auto-added margin and other positions.
| Tier | Range | Maintenance rate | Max leverage | Deduction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 – 3000 quote | 3.0000% | 25.00x | — |
| 2 | 3000 – 5000 quote | 3.5000% | 20.00x | 15 |
| 3 | 5000 – 10000 quote | 8.0000% | 10.00x | 240 |
| 4 | 10000 – 20000 quote | 10.0000% | 8.00x | 440 |
| 5 | 20000 – 30000 quote | 28.0000% | 3.30x | 4040 |
| 6 | 30000 – 50000 quote | 30.0000% | 3.00x | 4640 |
| 7 | 50000 – 100000 quote | 45.0000% | 2.00x | 12140 |
| 8 | 100000 – 200000 quote | 72.0000% | 1.30x | 39140 |
| 9 | 200000 – 300000 quote | 86.0000% | 1.10x | 67140 |
| 10 | 300000 – ∞ quote | 95.0000% | 1.00x | 94140 |
Contract specification
Quote currency: USDT · Settlement currency: USDT · Settlement interval: 8h (00:00 · 08:00 · 16:00 UTC). Lot size uses the venue’s original order unit; the calculator takes base-asset quantity. Settlement intervals and times on every venue.
The same asset elsewhere
| Venue | Contract | Rate period | Annualised |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binance | CELRUSDT | 8h | -32.46% |
| Gate this page | CELR_USDT | 8h | -0.77% |
| Bitget | CELRUSDT | 8h | +10.95% |
Common questions
What is the Gate CELR funding rate?
The latest collected Gate CELR funding rate is -0.0007% per 8h rate period, or -0.77% simple annualised. At this rate shorts pay longs.
How often is funding charged on Gate CELR?
The collected settlement interval is 8h, normally 3 times a day. Settlements fall at 00:00, 08:00 and 16:00 UTC, the same times in UTC+8. Venues can change it again; confirm the next settlement time on the venue's contract page.
What is the maximum leverage on Gate CELR?
The collected leverage cap for Gate CELR is 25x, with 10 margin tiers shown. The first margin tier, up to 3K USDT, allows 25x; the second allows 20x.
What is the maintenance margin rate on Gate CELR?
The first tier requires 3.0000%, with 10 available tiers. The applicable requirement depends on the position’s tier. This venue applies a deduction: maintenance margin = notional × tier rate − the tier's maintenance amount.
Which venue has the lowest CELR funding cost for longs?
For a long position, Binance currently has the lowest rate at -32.46% annualised; this page's Gate is at -0.77%. Negative funding pays longs. Trading costs are excluded, and the cash-flow direction reverses for shorts.
Observation time and verification
This contract’s funding was observed at 2026-10-15 05:57 UTC; an unsettled quote may still change. A dash denotes missing usable data, not zero. Gate official data source · Funding methodology